Accounting and corruption: A cross-country analysis

Christopher Ainge, Chad Orsen Albrecht, Ricardo Malagueño de Santana, Nate Stephens

Research output: Not indexed journal articleArticle


The purpose of this paper is to better understand the relationship between accounting and auditing quality and the perceived level of corruption. This relationship is studied by performing a cross-country analysis using public data to measure accounting quality, audit quality, and corruption. Consistent with the authors' predictions, the paper finds evidence that accounting and auditing quality are significantly related to the level of perceived corruption in a country. These findings suggest that countries with more transparent reporting have lower levels of perceived corruption and that the level of perceived corruption may be reduced in a country by improving accounting and auditing quality. The findings suggest that countries can reduce the level of perceived corruption by improving the transparency of financial reporting by improving accounting and auditing standards. While significant amounts of research has examined perceived corruption, this study is the first to address the impact of high-quality accounting information on the level of perceived corruption.
Original languageEnglish
Specialist publicationJournal of Money Laundering Control
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2010
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting and corruption: A cross-country analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this