Abstract
New working fluids (WFs) have been recently proposed to enhance the environmental performance of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) in waste heat recovery systems. However, a critical gap remains in the comprehensive evaluation of their environmental impacts, particularly those associated with the production of these compounds and their use in ORC systems. This study performs a comprehensive absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA) to evaluate the environmental trade-offs of replacing traditional WFs, such as R245fa, with emerging alternatives in ORC systems. An innovative methodology, integrating process simulation, life cycle assessment (LCA), prospective analysis, and the planetary boundaries (PBs) framework, is employed to provide a holistic sustainability assessment. The results show that using emerging WFs reduces 85% of the carbon footprint of ORCs. Although this transition shifts environmental burdens to the ozone depletion impact category, the system remains within the PBs’ safe operating space. The burden of the other environmental impact categories studied is reduced by more than 15%. The prospective analysis highlights that the transition from current to alternative WFs for ORC systems could cut around 237 million tons of annual CO2 emissions by 2050.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6685–6695 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 18 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 May 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- fluorinated gases
- LCA
- ORC
- planetary boundaries
- prospective LCA
- sustainability assessment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Emerging Working Fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver