Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Absence of objective differences between self-identified addicted and healthy smartphone users?

  • Kristoffer Geyer*
  • , Xavier Carbonell
  • , Marta Beranuy
  • , Fran Calvo
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Indexed journal article Articlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Smartphones are used by billions of people worldwide. However, some psychologists have argued that use of this technology is addictive, even though little research utilises objective smartphone usage records to verify this claim. We conducted an exploratory study to identify whether behavioural differences exist between those who self-identify as addicted smartphone users and those who do not. We gathered retrospective smartphone usage data from 131 Android users and asked them about their past use to compare their perception of their usage against their actual usage. We could not identify any reliable differences between the smartphone activity of those self-identified as addicted smartphone users and other users. Furthermore, smartphone scales are generally good at identifying who believes themselves to be addicted, although they do not reflect objective smartphone use. This study questions the use of self-report measures to diagnosis behavioural addictions without relevant psychopathological constructs and emphasises the need for more rigorous study to conceptualise smartphone addiction.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3702
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Behavioural addiction
  • CERM
  • Self-report measures
  • Smartphone addiction
  • Technological addiction
  • University students

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Absence of objective differences between self-identified addicted and healthy smartphone users?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this