Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A consensus degree for hesitant fuzzy linguistic decision making

  • Jordi Montserrat-Adell
  • , N. Agell
  • , Mónica Sanchez
  • , Francisco Javier Ruiz

Research output: Book chapterConference contributionpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes a measure of consensus for group decision making in the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets framework. An extension of the set of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets is considered to capture differences among discordant assessments. The difference between a pair of disjoint assessments is given by a measure that takes into account the gap between them. The proposed measure of consensus is defined using this extension, and, as a result, we obtain more accurate values, i.e., the new measure is able to distinguish among group consensus levels that were indistinguishable according to existing measures of consensus. An illustrative example is provided to show the potential of the proposed consensus degree, the process of its computation and a comparison with an existing approach based on a similarity among decision makers.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ 2017
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ISBN (Electronic)9781509060344
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes
Event2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ 2017 - Naples, Italy
Duration: 9 Jul 201712 Jul 2017

Publication series

NameIEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
ISSN (Print)1098-7584

Conference

Conference2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ 2017
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityNaples
Period9/07/1712/07/17

Keywords

  • Consensus models
  • Group decision making
  • Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets
  • Linguistic decision making

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A consensus degree for hesitant fuzzy linguistic decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this