TY - GEN
T1 - Together we win
T2 - 17th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, ICICKM 2020
AU - Bolisani, Ettore
AU - Fedeli, Monica
AU - De Marchi, Valentina
AU - Bierema, Laura
N1 - Funding Information:
Ettore Bolisani’s contribution to this study was supported by the projects DIECI and BIRD199795, funded by the University of Padova.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Communities of practice (CoPs) have been adopted in different contexts to facilitate knowledge exchange and mutual learning between professionals sharing common interests, practical issues, or decision problems. In higher education, they have been employed to favour interactions, "communitarian" mutual support, and exchange of experience within faculty, students, and staff. In all these situations, the central assumption is that collaboration helps, which implies a recognition that success in teaching and learning is more successful if individual problems, solutions, and experiences are shared and discussed openly. Currently, CoPs in general - and in education especially - are applied to "business as usual" situations - where there is often enough time for the community to discuss issues and reflect on possible solutions. Few is known about what happens in a totally different situation like the case of emergency - for instance, after a conflict, a natural disaster, or during a pandemic. In higher education, the faculty may need to react fast to ensure the continuity of educational services and/or to adapt it to the new scenarios. This paper examines the experience at University of Padova (Italy) at the time of the COVID crisis. The infection hit Italy at the beginning of the second term, and all instructors and students needed to quickly move all teaching and learning activities online. A CoP of faculty, established one year before, was asked to support this transition. The case study examines this experience by highlighting the structure of the CoP and its key roles, management style, functions and KM processes, achieved results, efficacy, and problematic issues. The paper provides lessons about pros and cons of a CoP in the special situation of a crisis due to pandemic. Also, it highlights pros and cons of this organizational arrangement applied to higher education institutions.
AB - Communities of practice (CoPs) have been adopted in different contexts to facilitate knowledge exchange and mutual learning between professionals sharing common interests, practical issues, or decision problems. In higher education, they have been employed to favour interactions, "communitarian" mutual support, and exchange of experience within faculty, students, and staff. In all these situations, the central assumption is that collaboration helps, which implies a recognition that success in teaching and learning is more successful if individual problems, solutions, and experiences are shared and discussed openly. Currently, CoPs in general - and in education especially - are applied to "business as usual" situations - where there is often enough time for the community to discuss issues and reflect on possible solutions. Few is known about what happens in a totally different situation like the case of emergency - for instance, after a conflict, a natural disaster, or during a pandemic. In higher education, the faculty may need to react fast to ensure the continuity of educational services and/or to adapt it to the new scenarios. This paper examines the experience at University of Padova (Italy) at the time of the COVID crisis. The infection hit Italy at the beginning of the second term, and all instructors and students needed to quickly move all teaching and learning activities online. A CoP of faculty, established one year before, was asked to support this transition. The case study examines this experience by highlighting the structure of the CoP and its key roles, management style, functions and KM processes, achieved results, efficacy, and problematic issues. The paper provides lessons about pros and cons of a CoP in the special situation of a crisis due to pandemic. Also, it highlights pros and cons of this organizational arrangement applied to higher education institutions.
KW - Communities of practice
KW - COVID 19
KW - Emergency
KW - Higher education
KW - University of Padova
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097824783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.34190/IKM.20.055
DO - 10.34190/IKM.20.055
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85097824783
T3 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, ICICKM
SP - 72
EP - 79
BT - Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, ICICKM 2020
A2 - Wensley, Anthony
A2 - Evans, Max
PB - Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited
Y2 - 15 October 2020 through 16 October 2020
ER -