TY - JOUR
T1 - The long-term efficiency of tactical asset allocation
T2 - Evidence from 86 systematic strategies (1995–2025)
AU - Prior Sanz, Francisco Javier
AU - Vizuete-Luciano, Emili
AU - Cruz Zayash, Alexander
AU - Ferrer Canteli, Marc
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2026. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2026/10
Y1 - 2026/10
N2 - This article conducts an analysis of 86 Tactical and Strategic Asset Allocation strategies over a dataset spanning January 1995 to April 2025. The study evaluates performance across multiple horizons, 30, 10, 5, and 1 year, as well as during four major stressed market environments, the dot com bubble (2000 2002), the Global Financial Crisis (2008 2009), the COVID 19 pandemic (2020 2023), and the Trump tariffs shock (March April 2025). The results show that, over the long term, Tactical Allocation Strategies (TAA) consistently outperform Strategic Allocation Strategies (SAA) including the traditional 60/40 benchmark in risk adjusted terms, while shorter horizons exhibit weaker and more unstable outcomes. During crises, many strategies provided resilience compared to the benchmark, although their effectiveness varied across environments. Boxplot and regression analyses highlight that certain features contribute more consistently to performance. Overall, the findings suggest that TAA can serve as a valuable complement to Strategic Asset Allocation, especially when designed with strong crash protection mechanisms, offering both improved long-term efficiency and resilience during market downturns.
AB - This article conducts an analysis of 86 Tactical and Strategic Asset Allocation strategies over a dataset spanning January 1995 to April 2025. The study evaluates performance across multiple horizons, 30, 10, 5, and 1 year, as well as during four major stressed market environments, the dot com bubble (2000 2002), the Global Financial Crisis (2008 2009), the COVID 19 pandemic (2020 2023), and the Trump tariffs shock (March April 2025). The results show that, over the long term, Tactical Allocation Strategies (TAA) consistently outperform Strategic Allocation Strategies (SAA) including the traditional 60/40 benchmark in risk adjusted terms, while shorter horizons exhibit weaker and more unstable outcomes. During crises, many strategies provided resilience compared to the benchmark, although their effectiveness varied across environments. Boxplot and regression analyses highlight that certain features contribute more consistently to performance. Overall, the findings suggest that TAA can serve as a valuable complement to Strategic Asset Allocation, especially when designed with strong crash protection mechanisms, offering both improved long-term efficiency and resilience during market downturns.
KW - Tactical asset allocation
KW - Momentum strategies
KW - Portfolio management
KW - Risk–adjusted performance
KW - Crisis resilience
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105048954374
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pure_univeritat_ramon_llull&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001866807000001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/7151
U2 - 10.1016/j.iref.2026.105748
DO - 10.1016/j.iref.2026.105748
M3 - Article
SN - 1059-0560
VL - 111
SP - 35
JO - International Review of Economics and Finance
JF - International Review of Economics and Finance
M1 - 105748
ER -