TY - JOUR
T1 - The Fault Lines of Leadership
T2 - Lessons from the Global Covid-19 Crisis
AU - Maak, Thomas
AU - Pless, Nicola M.
AU - Wohlgezogen, Franz
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In this article, we reflect on the role that leadership has played in the response to the global Covid-19 crisis. We discuss two major ‘fault lines' of leadership: narcissism, and ideological rigidity. A fault line is a problem that may not be obvious under normal circumstances but could cause leadership to fail stakeholders and society at large in a defining moment such as a global pandemic. Using case examples from global political leaders we elaborate on these breaking points in crisis leadership and contrast them with the healing properties of leader compassion and mending forces of evidence-based decision making. We conclude our article with implications for responsible leadership research and practice. MAD statement: The Covid-19 pandemic is a global health crisis of unprecedented speed and proportion and it has highlighted that crises can bring out the best and the worst in leaders. In this article, we aim to Make a Difference by encouraging reflection on the crucial role of responsible leadership in crisis, specifically leaders’ ability to build and cultivate sustainable and trustful relationships with different stakeholders. We draw attention to two toxic leadership tendencies–narcissism and ideological rigidity–and make an argument for curbing narcissism and instead fostering compassionate leadership, and for careful reflection on the role of ideology and evidence-based thinking in leadership development and practice.
AB - In this article, we reflect on the role that leadership has played in the response to the global Covid-19 crisis. We discuss two major ‘fault lines' of leadership: narcissism, and ideological rigidity. A fault line is a problem that may not be obvious under normal circumstances but could cause leadership to fail stakeholders and society at large in a defining moment such as a global pandemic. Using case examples from global political leaders we elaborate on these breaking points in crisis leadership and contrast them with the healing properties of leader compassion and mending forces of evidence-based decision making. We conclude our article with implications for responsible leadership research and practice. MAD statement: The Covid-19 pandemic is a global health crisis of unprecedented speed and proportion and it has highlighted that crises can bring out the best and the worst in leaders. In this article, we aim to Make a Difference by encouraging reflection on the crucial role of responsible leadership in crisis, specifically leaders’ ability to build and cultivate sustainable and trustful relationships with different stakeholders. We draw attention to two toxic leadership tendencies–narcissism and ideological rigidity–and make an argument for curbing narcissism and instead fostering compassionate leadership, and for careful reflection on the role of ideology and evidence-based thinking in leadership development and practice.
KW - compassionate leadership
KW - destructive leadership
KW - evidence-based thinking & ideology
KW - Leadership in crisis
KW - narcissism
KW - responsible leadership
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099448474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14697017.2021.1861724
DO - 10.1080/14697017.2021.1861724
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099448474
SN - 1469-7017
VL - 21
SP - 66
EP - 86
JO - Journal of Change Management
JF - Journal of Change Management
IS - 1
ER -