TY - JOUR
T1 - Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process
T2 - The case of a hybrid model
AU - Huyghe, Annelore Karen E.
AU - Knockaert, Mirjam
AU - Wright, Mike
AU - Piva, Evila
PY - 2014/8
Y1 - 2014/8
N2 - Over the past decades, universities have increasingly become ambidextrous organizations reconciling scientific and commercial missions. In order to manage this ambidexterity, technology transfer offices (TTOs) were established in most universities. This paper studies a specific, often implemented, but rather understudied type of TTO, namely a hybrid TTO model uniting centralized and decentralized levels. Employing a qualitative research design, we examine how and why the two TTO levels engage in diverse boundary spanning activities to help nascent spin-off companies move through the pre-spin-off process. Our research identifies differences in the types of boundary spanning activities that centralized and decentralized TTOs perform and in the parties they engage with. We find geographical, technological and organizational proximity to be important antecedents of the TTOs' engagement in external and internal boundary spanning activities. These results have important implications for both academics and practitioners interested in university technology transfer through spin-off creation.
AB - Over the past decades, universities have increasingly become ambidextrous organizations reconciling scientific and commercial missions. In order to manage this ambidexterity, technology transfer offices (TTOs) were established in most universities. This paper studies a specific, often implemented, but rather understudied type of TTO, namely a hybrid TTO model uniting centralized and decentralized levels. Employing a qualitative research design, we examine how and why the two TTO levels engage in diverse boundary spanning activities to help nascent spin-off companies move through the pre-spin-off process. Our research identifies differences in the types of boundary spanning activities that centralized and decentralized TTOs perform and in the parties they engage with. We find geographical, technological and organizational proximity to be important antecedents of the TTOs' engagement in external and internal boundary spanning activities. These results have important implications for both academics and practitioners interested in university technology transfer through spin-off creation.
KW - Boundary spanning
KW - Nascent spin-offs
KW - Proximity
KW - Technology transfer office
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904183326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11187-013-9537-1
DO - 10.1007/s11187-013-9537-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84904183326
SN - 0921-898X
VL - 43
SP - 289
EP - 307
JO - Small Business Economics
JF - Small Business Economics
IS - 2
ER -