TY - JOUR
T1 - Techno-economic and environmental evaluation of a market pulp reinforced with micro-/nanofibers as a strengthening agent in packaging paper
AU - Serra-Parareda, Ferran
AU - Aguado, Roberto
AU - Arfelis, Sergi
AU - Xifré, Ramon
AU - Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
AU - Delgado-Aguilar, Marc
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - Partly inspired by the concept of masterbatch in plastics manufacturing, we developed a strategy to improve the technical viability, the economic feasibility, and the environmental performance of lignocellulosic micro-/nanofibers. Instead of investing strenuous efforts in dewatering and/or drying nanocellulose suspensions to maximize their consistency without significantly hampering redispersion, which still stands as an unresolved challenge, we used them in high proportions (up to 50 wt%) to reinforce a high-yield pulp. The suspension can be dewatered-pressed (0.70–1.75 MPa) to obtain wet laps of never-dried reinforced pulps, or dried to consistencies over 90% to produce dry boards, but at the cost of lower strengthening capability. In any case, both wet and dry reinforced boards succeeded in enhancing the breaking length of a recycled pulp by up to 62% and 56%, respectively. In light of these results, we proposed a tentative upscaling and subsequent assessment of the process, evaluating different scenarios. From the technical point of view, reinforced pulp boards are much easier to handle and to deliver than dilute aqueous suspensions. In economic terms, savings in transportation costs are worth remarking. Last but not least, this strategy fulfills at least three goals associated with the concept of cleaner production: water recovery (internal recycling), lower CO2 emissions (especially if transportation takes place by road), and avoiding hazardous chemicals such as hypochlorite.
AB - Partly inspired by the concept of masterbatch in plastics manufacturing, we developed a strategy to improve the technical viability, the economic feasibility, and the environmental performance of lignocellulosic micro-/nanofibers. Instead of investing strenuous efforts in dewatering and/or drying nanocellulose suspensions to maximize their consistency without significantly hampering redispersion, which still stands as an unresolved challenge, we used them in high proportions (up to 50 wt%) to reinforce a high-yield pulp. The suspension can be dewatered-pressed (0.70–1.75 MPa) to obtain wet laps of never-dried reinforced pulps, or dried to consistencies over 90% to produce dry boards, but at the cost of lower strengthening capability. In any case, both wet and dry reinforced boards succeeded in enhancing the breaking length of a recycled pulp by up to 62% and 56%, respectively. In light of these results, we proposed a tentative upscaling and subsequent assessment of the process, evaluating different scenarios. From the technical point of view, reinforced pulp boards are much easier to handle and to deliver than dilute aqueous suspensions. In economic terms, savings in transportation costs are worth remarking. Last but not least, this strategy fulfills at least three goals associated with the concept of cleaner production: water recovery (internal recycling), lower CO2 emissions (especially if transportation takes place by road), and avoiding hazardous chemicals such as hypochlorite.
KW - Chemical-free production
KW - Lignocellulosic micro-/nanofibers
KW - Masterbatch strategy
KW - Nanocellulose
KW - Transport emissions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126126084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131265
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131265
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126126084
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 347
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 131265
ER -