TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainability as Justice
T2 - Making the “Leave No One Behind” Work
AU - Taratori, Rallou
AU - Comim, Flavio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Sustainable Development published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/11/15
Y1 - 2025/11/15
N2 - This paper critically engages with the LNOB principle of the 2030 Agenda, highlighting its conceptual, methodological, and structural limitations. Building on Amartya Sen's social choice theory and Rawlsian justice, it reconceptualizes “sustainability as justice,” emphasizing real-world comparative assessments grounded in intersectionality. It develops a novel methodological framework combining the CART algorithm and its descriptive and statistical outputs with the D-index to systematically identify, measure and assess exclusion across plural informational spaces—resources, capabilities, rights and liberties, and subjective well-being. Applying this framework to MICS data across nine countries, the paper reveals how conventional SDG disaggregation masks structural inequalities and fails to capture the realities of the worst-off groups. Instead, it uncovers context-specific patterns of deprivation and prioritization, offering targeted, empirically grounded insights for policy reforms. Ultimately, this approach reorients LNOB from an aspirational slogan to a justice-centered, operational tool capable of diagnosing and addressing systemic disadvantage in sustainable development.
AB - This paper critically engages with the LNOB principle of the 2030 Agenda, highlighting its conceptual, methodological, and structural limitations. Building on Amartya Sen's social choice theory and Rawlsian justice, it reconceptualizes “sustainability as justice,” emphasizing real-world comparative assessments grounded in intersectionality. It develops a novel methodological framework combining the CART algorithm and its descriptive and statistical outputs with the D-index to systematically identify, measure and assess exclusion across plural informational spaces—resources, capabilities, rights and liberties, and subjective well-being. Applying this framework to MICS data across nine countries, the paper reveals how conventional SDG disaggregation masks structural inequalities and fails to capture the realities of the worst-off groups. Instead, it uncovers context-specific patterns of deprivation and prioritization, offering targeted, empirically grounded insights for policy reforms. Ultimately, this approach reorients LNOB from an aspirational slogan to a justice-centered, operational tool capable of diagnosing and addressing systemic disadvantage in sustainable development.
KW - CART algorithm
KW - intersectionality
KW - justice
KW - LNOB
KW - social choice theory
KW - sustainability
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021831883
U2 - 10.1002/sd.70430
DO - 10.1002/sd.70430
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105021831883
SN - 0968-0802
JO - Sustainable Development
JF - Sustainable Development
ER -