Strong Reciprocity in Consumer Boycotts

Tobias Hahn, Noël Albert

Producció científica: Article en revista indexadaArticleAvaluat per experts

30 Cites (Scopus)


Boycotts are among the most frequent forms of consumer expression against unethical or egregious acts by firms. Most current research explains consumers’ decisions to participate in a boycott using a universal cost-benefit model that mixes instrumental and expressive motives. To date, no conceptual framework accounts for the distinct behavioral motives for boycotting though. This article focuses on motivational heterogeneity among consumers. By distinguishing two stable behavioral models—a self-regarding type and a strongly reciprocal type—we introduce the notion of strong reciprocity to the boycott literature. We argue that the presence of strongly reciprocal consumers can enhance boycott success. First, in interactions with the target firm, strongly reciprocal consumers perceive higher levels of egregiousness and are more willing to engage in boycotting behavior, even in unfavorable strategic conditions, which provides a stable basis for boycotting. Second, in interactions with self-regarding consumers, strongly reciprocal consumers are willing to sanction those others, according to whether they participate in the boycott, which increases overall participation in and the likelihood of success of a consumer boycott. These findings have implications for further research, as well as for firms, nongovernmental organizations, and boycotters.

Idioma originalAnglès
Pàgines (de-a)509-524
Nombre de pàgines16
RevistaJournal of Business Ethics
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 1 d’oct. 2017
Publicat externament


Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Strong Reciprocity in Consumer Boycotts'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho