TY - JOUR
T1 - Spot sign number is the most important spot sign characteristic for predicting hematoma expansion using first-pass computed tomography angiography
T2 - Analysis from the PREDICT study
AU - Huynh, Thien J.
AU - Demchuk, Andrew M.
AU - Dowlatshahi, Dar
AU - Gladstone, David J.
AU - Krischek, Özlem
AU - Kiss, Alex
AU - Hill, Michael D.
AU - Molina, Carlos A.
AU - Rodriguez-Luna, David
AU - Dzialowski, Imanuel
AU - Silva, Yolanda
AU - Czlonkowska, Anna
AU - Lum, Cheemun
AU - Boulanger, Jean Martin
AU - Gubitz, Gord
AU - Bhatia, Rohit
AU - Padma, Vasantha
AU - Roy, Jayanta
AU - Kase, Carlos S.
AU - Aviv, Richard I.
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - Background and Purpose-The spot sign score (SSS) provides risk stratification for hematoma expansion in acute intracerebral hemorrhage; however, external validation is needed. We sought to validate the SSS and assess prognostic performance of individual spot characteristics associated with hematoma expansion from a prospective multicenter intracerebral hemorrhage study. Methods-Two hundred twenty-eight intracerebral hemorrhage patients within 6 hours after ictus were enrolled in the Predicting Hematoma Growth and Outcome in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Contrast Bolus CT (PREDICT) study, a multicenter prospective intracerebral hemorrhage cohort study. Patients were evaluated with baseline noncontrast computerized tomography, computerized tomography angiography, and 24-hour follow-up computerized tomography. Primary outcome was significant hematoma expansion (>6 mL or >33%) and secondary outcome was absolute and relative expansion. Blinded computerized tomography angiography spot sign characterization and SSS calculation were independently performed by 2 neuroradiologists and a radiology resident. Diagnostic performance of the SSS and individual spot characteristics were examined with multivariable regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and tests for trend. Results-SSS and spot number independently predicted significant, absolute, and relative hematoma expansion (P<0.05 each) and demonstrated near perfect interobserver agreement (κ=0.82 and κ=0.85, respectively). Incremental risk of hematoma expansion among spot-positive patients was not identified for SSS (P trend=0.720) but was demonstrated for spot number (P trend=0.050). Spot number and SSS demonstrated similar area under the curve (0.69 versus 0.68; P=0.306) for hematoma expansion. Conclusions-Multicenter external validation of the SSS demonstrates that the spot number alone provides similar prediction but improved risk stratification of hematoma expansion compared with the SSS.
AB - Background and Purpose-The spot sign score (SSS) provides risk stratification for hematoma expansion in acute intracerebral hemorrhage; however, external validation is needed. We sought to validate the SSS and assess prognostic performance of individual spot characteristics associated with hematoma expansion from a prospective multicenter intracerebral hemorrhage study. Methods-Two hundred twenty-eight intracerebral hemorrhage patients within 6 hours after ictus were enrolled in the Predicting Hematoma Growth and Outcome in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Contrast Bolus CT (PREDICT) study, a multicenter prospective intracerebral hemorrhage cohort study. Patients were evaluated with baseline noncontrast computerized tomography, computerized tomography angiography, and 24-hour follow-up computerized tomography. Primary outcome was significant hematoma expansion (>6 mL or >33%) and secondary outcome was absolute and relative expansion. Blinded computerized tomography angiography spot sign characterization and SSS calculation were independently performed by 2 neuroradiologists and a radiology resident. Diagnostic performance of the SSS and individual spot characteristics were examined with multivariable regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and tests for trend. Results-SSS and spot number independently predicted significant, absolute, and relative hematoma expansion (P<0.05 each) and demonstrated near perfect interobserver agreement (κ=0.82 and κ=0.85, respectively). Incremental risk of hematoma expansion among spot-positive patients was not identified for SSS (P trend=0.720) but was demonstrated for spot number (P trend=0.050). Spot number and SSS demonstrated similar area under the curve (0.69 versus 0.68; P=0.306) for hematoma expansion. Conclusions-Multicenter external validation of the SSS demonstrates that the spot number alone provides similar prediction but improved risk stratification of hematoma expansion compared with the SSS.
KW - Computed tomography angiography
KW - Intracerebral hemorrhage
KW - Prognosis
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876285138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000410
DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000410
M3 - Article
C2 - 23444309
AN - SCOPUS:84876285138
SN - 0039-2499
VL - 44
SP - 972
EP - 977
JO - Stroke
JF - Stroke
IS - 4
ER -