TY - JOUR
T1 - Repeatability and learning effect in the 6MWT in preoperative cancer patients undergoing a prehabilitation program
AU - Sebio-Garcia, Raquel
AU - Dana, Fernando
AU - Gimeno-Santos, Elena
AU - López-Baamonde, Manuel
AU - Ubré, Marta
AU - Montané-Muntané, Mar
AU - Risco, Raquel
AU - Messagi-Sartor, Monique
AU - Roca, Josep
AU - Martínez-Palli, Graciela
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the staff members of the Prehabilitation Unit at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona and for their collaboration to the achievement of this work. The Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Prehabilitation Group members: Maria José Arguis (MJA), Anael Barberán-García (AB), Betina Campero (BC), Isaac Cano (IC), David Capitán (DC), Ana Costas (AC), Fernando Dana (FD), Elena Gimeno-Santos (EG), Rubén González (RG), Antonio M Lacy (AML), Sara Laxe (SL), Antonio López (AL), Manuel López-Baamonde (MLB), Graciela Martínez-Pallí (GMP), Monique Messaggi-Sartor (MMS), Mar Montané-Muntané (MM), Ricard Navarro-Ripoll (RN), Amaia Peláez (AP), Juan M Perdomo (JP), Raquel Risco (RR), Josep Roca (JR), Barbara Romano-Andrioni (BR), Raquel Sebio-Garcia (RS), Marina Sisó (MS), Beatriz Tena (BT), Silvia Terés (ST), Marta Ubré (MU), and Francisco J Vega (FV).
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the partners from the PAPRIKA project ( https://eithealth.eu/project/paprika/ ), FIS-Smart PITeS (PI18/00841), and FIS (PI13/ 04255, PI17/00852, PI20/00835).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Objective: The main objective was to assess repeatability and learning effect of the 6-min walk test (6MWT) in a cohort of preoperative cancer patients referred to a prehabilitation program. As a secondary objective, we aimed to identify determinants of improvement in the second test. Materials and methods: Secondary analysis from a large prospective study on the implementation of a multimodal prehabilitation program in a real-life scenario. Eligible patients were assessed at baseline before starting the prehabilitation program. The 6MWT was conducted according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines with two tests being performed under identical conditions separated by 30 min. The distance covered (in meters) and the physiological responses (heart rate, oxygen saturation, fatigue, and dyspnea) to each test were recorded and compared. Results: A total of 170 patients (60.9%) were analyzed. Repeatability of the distance covered with the 6MWT was excellent (ICC = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.92–0.99), but a mean increase of + 19.5 m (95% CI: 15.6–23.5 m; p = <.001) in the second test was found, showing a learning effect with limits of agreement between − 31.3 and 70.4 m. Coefficient of variation was 4%. No clinical factor was found to be associated with an improvement in the second test. Conclusions: The 6MWT showed excellent repeatability in preoperative cancer patients, but a significant learning effect is present. No associated factors with a clinically meaningful improvement in the second test were identified. In light of these findings, two attempts of the 6MWT should be encouraged in this population.
AB - Objective: The main objective was to assess repeatability and learning effect of the 6-min walk test (6MWT) in a cohort of preoperative cancer patients referred to a prehabilitation program. As a secondary objective, we aimed to identify determinants of improvement in the second test. Materials and methods: Secondary analysis from a large prospective study on the implementation of a multimodal prehabilitation program in a real-life scenario. Eligible patients were assessed at baseline before starting the prehabilitation program. The 6MWT was conducted according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines with two tests being performed under identical conditions separated by 30 min. The distance covered (in meters) and the physiological responses (heart rate, oxygen saturation, fatigue, and dyspnea) to each test were recorded and compared. Results: A total of 170 patients (60.9%) were analyzed. Repeatability of the distance covered with the 6MWT was excellent (ICC = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.92–0.99), but a mean increase of + 19.5 m (95% CI: 15.6–23.5 m; p = <.001) in the second test was found, showing a learning effect with limits of agreement between − 31.3 and 70.4 m. Coefficient of variation was 4%. No clinical factor was found to be associated with an improvement in the second test. Conclusions: The 6MWT showed excellent repeatability in preoperative cancer patients, but a significant learning effect is present. No associated factors with a clinically meaningful improvement in the second test were identified. In light of these findings, two attempts of the 6MWT should be encouraged in this population.
KW - Cancer
KW - Prehabilitation
KW - Repeatability
KW - Six-minute walk test
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125400785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-022-06934-6
DO - 10.1007/s00520-022-06934-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 35229179
AN - SCOPUS:85125400785
SN - 0941-4355
VL - 30
SP - 5107
EP - 5114
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
IS - 6
ER -