TY - JOUR
T1 - Reframing the science and policy of nicotine, illegal drugs and alcohol - conclusions of the ALICE RAP Project
AU - Anderson, Peter
AU - Berridge, Virginia
AU - Conrod, Patricia
AU - Dudley, Robert
AU - Hellman, Matilda
AU - Lachenmeier, Dirk
AU - Lingford-Hughes, Anne
AU - Miller, David
AU - Rehm, Jürgen
AU - Room, Robin
AU - Schmidt, Laura
AU - Sullivan, Roger
AU - Ysa, T.
AU - Gual, Antoni
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Anderson P et al.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - In 2013, illegal drug use was responsible for 1.8% of years of life lost in the European Union, alcohol was responsible for 8.2% and tobacco for 18.2%, imposing economic burdens in excess of 2.5% of GDP. No single European country has optimal governance structures for reducing the harm done by nicotine, illegal drugs and alcohol, and existing ones are poorly designed, fragmented, and sometimes cause harm. Reporting the main science and policy conclusions of a transdisciplinary five-year analysis of the place of addictions in Europe, researchers from 67 scientific institutions addressed these problems by reframing an understanding of addictions. A new paradigm needs to account for evolutionary evidence which suggests that humans are biologically predisposed to seek out drugs, and that, today, individuals face availability of high drug doses, consequently increasing the risk of harm. New definitions need to acknowledge that the defining element of addictive drugs is "heavy use over time", a concept that could replace the diagnostic artefact captured by the clinical term "substance use disorder", thus opening the door for new substances to be considered such as sugar. Tools of quantitative risk assessment that recognize drugs as toxins could be further deployed to assess regulatory approaches to reducing harm. Re-designed governance of drugs requires embedding policy within a comprehensive societal well-being frame that encompasses a range of domains of well-being, including quality of life, material living conditions and sustainability over time; such a frame adds arguments to the inappropriateness of policies that criminalize individuals for using drugs and that continue to categorize certain drugs as illegal. A health footprint, modelled on the carbon footprint, and using quantitative measures such as years of life lost due to death or disability, could serve as the accountability tool that apportions responsibility for who and what causes drug-related harm.
AB - In 2013, illegal drug use was responsible for 1.8% of years of life lost in the European Union, alcohol was responsible for 8.2% and tobacco for 18.2%, imposing economic burdens in excess of 2.5% of GDP. No single European country has optimal governance structures for reducing the harm done by nicotine, illegal drugs and alcohol, and existing ones are poorly designed, fragmented, and sometimes cause harm. Reporting the main science and policy conclusions of a transdisciplinary five-year analysis of the place of addictions in Europe, researchers from 67 scientific institutions addressed these problems by reframing an understanding of addictions. A new paradigm needs to account for evolutionary evidence which suggests that humans are biologically predisposed to seek out drugs, and that, today, individuals face availability of high drug doses, consequently increasing the risk of harm. New definitions need to acknowledge that the defining element of addictive drugs is "heavy use over time", a concept that could replace the diagnostic artefact captured by the clinical term "substance use disorder", thus opening the door for new substances to be considered such as sugar. Tools of quantitative risk assessment that recognize drugs as toxins could be further deployed to assess regulatory approaches to reducing harm. Re-designed governance of drugs requires embedding policy within a comprehensive societal well-being frame that encompasses a range of domains of well-being, including quality of life, material living conditions and sustainability over time; such a frame adds arguments to the inappropriateness of policies that criminalize individuals for using drugs and that continue to categorize certain drugs as illegal. A health footprint, modelled on the carbon footprint, and using quantitative measures such as years of life lost due to death or disability, could serve as the accountability tool that apportions responsibility for who and what causes drug-related harm.
KW - Alcohol
KW - Evolutionary biology
KW - Governance
KW - Health footprint
KW - Illegal drugs
KW - Margins of exposure
KW - Nicotine
KW - Well-being
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017358999&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.12688/f1000research.10860.1
DO - 10.12688/f1000research.10860.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85017358999
SN - 2046-1402
VL - 6
JO - F1000Research
JF - F1000Research
M1 - 289
ER -