TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary care-based screening and management of depression amongst heavy drinking patients
T2 - Interim secondary outcomes of a three-country quasiexperimental study in Latin America
AU - O'Donnell, Amy
AU - Schulte, Bernd
AU - Manthey, Jakob
AU - Schmidt, Christiane Sybille
AU - Piazza, Marina
AU - Chavez, Ines Bustamante
AU - Natera, Guillermina
AU - Aguilar, Natalia Bautista
AU - Hernández, Graciela Yazmín Sánchez
AU - Mejía-Trujillo, Juliana
AU - Pérez-Gómez, Augusto
AU - Gual, Antoni
AU - de Vries, Hein
AU - Solovei, Adriana
AU - Kokole, Dasa
AU - Kaner, Eileen
AU - Kilian, Carolin
AU - Rehm, Jurgen
AU - Anderson, Peter
AU - Jané-Llopis, Eva
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 O'Donnell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Introduction Implementation of evidence-based care for heavy drinking and depression remains low in global health systems. We tested the impact of providing community support, training, and clinical packages of varied intensity on depression screening and management for heavy drinking patients in Latin American primary healthcare. Materials and methods Quasi-experimental study involving 58 primary healthcare units in Colombia, Mexico and Peru randomized to receive: (1) usual care (control); (2) training using a brief clinical package; (3) community support plus training using a brief clinical package; (4) community support plus training using a standard clinical package. Outcomes were proportion of: (1) heavy drinking patients screened for depression; (2) screen-positive patients receiving appropriate support; (3) all consulting patients screened for depression, irrespective of drinking status. Results 550/615 identified heavy drinkers were screened for depression (89.4%). 147/230 patients screening positive for depression received appropriate support (64%). Amongst identified heavy drinkers, adjusting for country, sex, age and provider profession, provision of community support and training had no impact on depression activity rates. Intensity of clinical package also did not affect delivery rates, with comparable performance for brief and standard versions. However, amongst all consulting patients, training providers resulted in significantly higher rates of alcohol measurement and in turn higher depression screening rates; 2.7 times higher compared to those not trained. Conclusions Training using a brief clinical package increased depression screening rates in Latin American primary healthcare. It is not possible to determine the effectiveness of community support on depression activity rates due to the impact of COVID-19.
AB - Introduction Implementation of evidence-based care for heavy drinking and depression remains low in global health systems. We tested the impact of providing community support, training, and clinical packages of varied intensity on depression screening and management for heavy drinking patients in Latin American primary healthcare. Materials and methods Quasi-experimental study involving 58 primary healthcare units in Colombia, Mexico and Peru randomized to receive: (1) usual care (control); (2) training using a brief clinical package; (3) community support plus training using a brief clinical package; (4) community support plus training using a standard clinical package. Outcomes were proportion of: (1) heavy drinking patients screened for depression; (2) screen-positive patients receiving appropriate support; (3) all consulting patients screened for depression, irrespective of drinking status. Results 550/615 identified heavy drinkers were screened for depression (89.4%). 147/230 patients screening positive for depression received appropriate support (64%). Amongst identified heavy drinkers, adjusting for country, sex, age and provider profession, provision of community support and training had no impact on depression activity rates. Intensity of clinical package also did not affect delivery rates, with comparable performance for brief and standard versions. However, amongst all consulting patients, training providers resulted in significantly higher rates of alcohol measurement and in turn higher depression screening rates; 2.7 times higher compared to those not trained. Conclusions Training using a brief clinical package increased depression screening rates in Latin American primary healthcare. It is not possible to determine the effectiveness of community support on depression activity rates due to the impact of COVID-19.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112597744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0255594
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0255594
M3 - Article
C2 - 34352012
AN - SCOPUS:85112597744
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 16
JO - PLOS ONE
JF - PLOS ONE
IS - 8 August
M1 - e0255594
ER -