P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016)

Uri Simonsohn, Leif D. Nelson, Joseph P. Simmons

Producció científica: Article en revista indexadaArticleAvaluat per experts

15 Cites (Scopus)

Resum

p-curve, the distribution of significant p-values, can be analyzed to assess if the findings have evidential value, whether p-hacking and file-drawering can be ruled out as the sole explanations for them. Bruns and Ioannidis (2016) have proposed p-curve cannot examine evidential value with observational data. Their discussion confuses false-positive findings with confounded ones, failing to distinguish correlation from causation. We demonstrate this important distinction by showing that a confounded but real, hence replicable association, gun ownership and number of sexual partners, leads to a right-skewed p-curve, while a false-positive one, respondent ID number and trust in the supreme court, leads to a flat p-curve. P-curve can distinguish between replicable and non-replicable findings. The observational nature of the data is not consequential.

Idioma originalAnglès
Número d’articlee0213454
RevistaPLoS ONE
Volum14
Número3
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - de març 2019
Publicat externament

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016)'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho