TY - JOUR
T1 - Networks of innovation and modularity
T2 - A dynamic perspective
AU - Chesbrough, Henry
AU - Prencipe, Andrea
PY - 2008/7
Y1 - 2008/7
N2 - The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive perspective for understanding the dynamics of modularity and the implications of those dynamics for innovation networks. The main contention of this paper is that the dynamics of technology development should reflect the dynamics of a firm network. During the early development of a technology, when the interactions among component types are unclear (in a state of flux) and, therefore, difficult to codify and freeze, organisations build connections with research centres and universities to explore alternative technological solutions. Once such interactions are better understood, codified, modularised and shared, then more exploitative networks (e.g., with suppliers and customers) may be better suited to exploit the current technology. In the transition from the early development phase to the more mature phase, firms must build ties to startups and new entrants, because these firms experiment with alternative design configurations that exploit the underlying technology. In addition, during this transition stage, firms must connect to third-party firms, since the supporting investments made by these firms may determine which of the alternative configurations will become 'the standard'. During this stage, the relationships across firms are defined and governed by modular interfaces that are, in turn, dictated by product interfaces.
AB - The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive perspective for understanding the dynamics of modularity and the implications of those dynamics for innovation networks. The main contention of this paper is that the dynamics of technology development should reflect the dynamics of a firm network. During the early development of a technology, when the interactions among component types are unclear (in a state of flux) and, therefore, difficult to codify and freeze, organisations build connections with research centres and universities to explore alternative technological solutions. Once such interactions are better understood, codified, modularised and shared, then more exploitative networks (e.g., with suppliers and customers) may be better suited to exploit the current technology. In the transition from the early development phase to the more mature phase, firms must build ties to startups and new entrants, because these firms experiment with alternative design configurations that exploit the underlying technology. In addition, during this transition stage, firms must connect to third-party firms, since the supporting investments made by these firms may determine which of the alternative configurations will become 'the standard'. During this stage, the relationships across firms are defined and governed by modular interfaces that are, in turn, dictated by product interfaces.
KW - Development
KW - Development dynamics
KW - Innovation networks
KW - Modular architectures
KW - Modularity
KW - Organisational interfaces
KW - Technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48449106495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1504/IJTM.2008.019383
DO - 10.1504/IJTM.2008.019383
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:48449106495
SN - 0267-5730
VL - 42
SP - 414
EP - 425
JO - International Journal of Technology Management
JF - International Journal of Technology Management
IS - 4
ER -