TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education
T2 - Engineering Studies
AU - Baques, Nuria Llaverias
AU - Ferrero, Jordi Diaz
AU - Pozo, Guillermo Reyes
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Asociacion de Quimicos del Instituto Quimico de Sarria. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - This article aims to identify and analyze various models developed in Europe over the past 20 years for the immediate and effective implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in higher education, with a particular focus on engineering studies. The models are examined in correlation with reference examples from different countries and universities, along with the strategies employed to integrate sustainable development (SD). From the research conducted, comparative tables have been created to evaluate the barriers, accelerators, advantages, and disadvantages of various implementation strategies. The authors emphasize the importance of actionable outcomes, highlighting two key points: first, the necessity of integrated action and maximizing the participation of the university community and its stakeholders; second, the need for engineering curricula to incorporate critical concepts and SDGs, alongside the creation of curricular spaces that foster high-level competencies and enable transdisciplinary learning. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of supporting educators in this process. Establishing accompaniment teams and providing collaborative spaces for dialogue and adjustment are critical to accommodating diverse perspectives and implementation paces. Drawing from prior research and publications, the practical approach developed here reaffirms the feasibility of ESD implementation, providing reassurance to stakeholders about its practicality and impact.
AB - This article aims to identify and analyze various models developed in Europe over the past 20 years for the immediate and effective implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in higher education, with a particular focus on engineering studies. The models are examined in correlation with reference examples from different countries and universities, along with the strategies employed to integrate sustainable development (SD). From the research conducted, comparative tables have been created to evaluate the barriers, accelerators, advantages, and disadvantages of various implementation strategies. The authors emphasize the importance of actionable outcomes, highlighting two key points: first, the necessity of integrated action and maximizing the participation of the university community and its stakeholders; second, the need for engineering curricula to incorporate critical concepts and SDGs, alongside the creation of curricular spaces that foster high-level competencies and enable transdisciplinary learning. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of supporting educators in this process. Establishing accompaniment teams and providing collaborative spaces for dialogue and adjustment are critical to accommodating diverse perspectives and implementation paces. Drawing from prior research and publications, the practical approach developed here reaffirms the feasibility of ESD implementation, providing reassurance to stakeholders about its practicality and impact.
KW - Engineering education
KW - Higher education
KW - SDG
KW - Sustainability
KW - Sustainable development
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005435858
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pure_univeritat_ramon_llull&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001521758900005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5476
U2 - 10.55815/431883
DO - 10.55815/431883
M3 - Article
SN - 0001-9704
VL - 82
SP - 385
EP - 398
JO - Afinidad
JF - Afinidad
IS - 605
ER -