I know why you voted for Trump: (Over)inferring motives based on choice

Producció científica: Article en revista indexadaArticleAvaluat per experts

4 Cites (Scopus)


People often speculate about why others make the choices they do. This paper investigates how such inferences are formed as a function of what is chosen. Specifically, when observers encounter someone else's choice (e.g., of political candidate), they use the chosen option's attribute values (e.g., a candidate's specific stance on a policy issue) to infer the importance of that attribute (e.g., the policy issue) to the decision-maker. Consequently, when a chosen option has an attribute whose value is extreme (e.g., an extreme policy stance), observers infer—sometimes incorrectly—that this attribute disproportionately motivated the decision-maker's choice. Seven studies demonstrate how observers use an attribute's value to infer its weight—the value-weight heuristic—and identify the role of perceived diagnosticity: more extreme attribute values give observers the subjective sense that they know more about a decision-maker's preferences, and in turn, increase the attribute's perceived importance. The paper explores how this heuristic can produce erroneous inferences and influence broader beliefs about decision-makers.

Idioma originalAnglès
Pàgines (de-a)85-97
Nombre de pàgines13
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - de jul. 2019
Publicat externament


Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'I know why you voted for Trump: (Over)inferring motives based on choice'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho