TY - JOUR
T1 - Flow dimensions on daily activities with the Spanish version of the flow scale (DFS)
AU - Rufi, Sergi
AU - Javaloy, Federico
AU - Batista-Foguet, J.
AU - Solanas, Antonio
AU - Páez, Darío
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014.
PY - 2014/11/27
Y1 - 2014/11/27
N2 - A sample of 250 students of psychology with an average age of 20.37 years, answered the Flow Q questionnaire indicating their favorite flow activity, and the Spanish version of the Dispositional Flow Scale (DFS). A confirmatory factor analysis assessed the DFS construct validity of the flow model on daily activities. Both a hierarchical model of eight first order factors reflecting a second order global flow factor, and a model with eight formative first order flow dimensions, showed good fit and discriminant power. Most optimal activities were found to be individual and structured, such as studying, reading and certain forms of individual sports. Leisure activities turned out to be more rewarding than studying. Sports displayed more flow, clear goals, merging of action and awareness, and autotelic experience. Reading also showed more flow, balance of challenge and skills, feedback, merging of action and awareness, and loss of self-consciousness. On the other hand, studying displayed less flow, merging of action and awareness, and autotelic experience.
AB - A sample of 250 students of psychology with an average age of 20.37 years, answered the Flow Q questionnaire indicating their favorite flow activity, and the Spanish version of the Dispositional Flow Scale (DFS). A confirmatory factor analysis assessed the DFS construct validity of the flow model on daily activities. Both a hierarchical model of eight first order factors reflecting a second order global flow factor, and a model with eight formative first order flow dimensions, showed good fit and discriminant power. Most optimal activities were found to be individual and structured, such as studying, reading and certain forms of individual sports. Leisure activities turned out to be more rewarding than studying. Sports displayed more flow, clear goals, merging of action and awareness, and autotelic experience. Reading also showed more flow, balance of challenge and skills, feedback, merging of action and awareness, and loss of self-consciousness. On the other hand, studying displayed less flow, merging of action and awareness, and autotelic experience.
KW - daily optimal activities
KW - flow
KW - flow dimensions
KW - formative and reflective analysis models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912012566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/sjp.2014.34
DO - 10.1017/sjp.2014.34
M3 - Article
C2 - 25012500
AN - SCOPUS:84912012566
SN - 1138-7416
VL - 17
JO - Spanish Journal of Psychology
JF - Spanish Journal of Psychology
IS - 2
M1 - e30
ER -