TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the co-creation process in public health interventions
T2 - the PROSECO framework
AU - Longworth, Giuliana Raffaella
AU - Agnello, Danielle Marie
AU - Chastin, Sebastien
AU - Davis, Aaron
AU - Hidalgo, Enric Senabre
AU - Baselga, Sergio Villanueva
AU - McCaffrey, Lauren
AU - Restrepo, Jorge Zapata
AU - Coll-Planas, Laura
AU - Giné-Garriga, Maria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - Objectives: To date, there is a lack of evaluation frameworks to guide the planning and conducting of the evaluation of co-creation in public health. This study aims to identify and set the components of the PROSECO framework (PROcesS Evaluation framework for CO-creation) to support the evaluation of co-creation processes in public health interventions. Study design: A multi-step, iterative approach combining the outcomes of two scoping reviews, expert validation, and design refinement. Methods: The PROSECO framework was developed in three steps. Firstly, collecting results from two scoping reviews on process evaluation for co-creation and evaluation of co-creation methods. The scoping review results were analysed and refined by a selected group of experts and through a three-round anonymous survey. Based on those findings, the framework visualisation was developed and designed through multiple design iterations. Results: The PROcesS Evaluation framework for CO-creation, called the PROSECO framework, was developed to assist researchers and stakeholders in evaluating a co-creation process. The framework comprises a list of 37 components grouped under the five dimensions of Delivery, Participation, Experiential, Context, and Impact. Conclusions: PROSECO is the first framework to offer a systematic approach to evaluating co-creation. By integrating a diverse set of evaluation components, encompassing delivery, participation, experiential, impact, and context, it offers a flexible and comprehensive approach to address the complex nature of co-creation.
AB - Objectives: To date, there is a lack of evaluation frameworks to guide the planning and conducting of the evaluation of co-creation in public health. This study aims to identify and set the components of the PROSECO framework (PROcesS Evaluation framework for CO-creation) to support the evaluation of co-creation processes in public health interventions. Study design: A multi-step, iterative approach combining the outcomes of two scoping reviews, expert validation, and design refinement. Methods: The PROSECO framework was developed in three steps. Firstly, collecting results from two scoping reviews on process evaluation for co-creation and evaluation of co-creation methods. The scoping review results were analysed and refined by a selected group of experts and through a three-round anonymous survey. Based on those findings, the framework visualisation was developed and designed through multiple design iterations. Results: The PROcesS Evaluation framework for CO-creation, called the PROSECO framework, was developed to assist researchers and stakeholders in evaluating a co-creation process. The framework comprises a list of 37 components grouped under the five dimensions of Delivery, Participation, Experiential, Context, and Impact. Conclusions: PROSECO is the first framework to offer a systematic approach to evaluating co-creation. By integrating a diverse set of evaluation components, encompassing delivery, participation, experiential, impact, and context, it offers a flexible and comprehensive approach to address the complex nature of co-creation.
KW - Co-creation
KW - Co-design
KW - Co-production
KW - Evaluation
KW - Participatory
KW - Process evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105006703710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105783
DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105783
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105006703710
SN - 0033-3506
VL - 245
JO - Public Health
JF - Public Health
M1 - 105783
ER -