TY - JOUR
T1 - Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and injection-port derivatization for the determination of free lipophilic compounds in fruit juices by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
AU - Marsol-Vall, Alexis
AU - Balcells, Mercè
AU - Eras, Jordi
AU - Canela-Garayoa, Ramon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/4/28
Y1 - 2017/4/28
N2 - A method consisting of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) followed by injection-port derivatization and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) for the analysis of free lipophilic compounds in fruit juices is described. The method allows the analysis of several classes of lipophilic compounds, such as fatty acids, fatty alcohols, phytosterols and triterpenes. The chromatographic separation of the compounds was achieved in a chromatographic run of 25.5 min. The best conditions for the dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction were 100 μL of CHCl3 in 1 mL of acetone. For the injection-port derivatization, the best conditions were at 280 °C, 1 min purge-off, and a 1:1 sample:derivatization reagent ratio (v/v) using N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA):pyridine (1:1) as reagent. Quality parameters were assessed for the target compounds, giving a limits of detection (LODs) ranging from 1.1 to 5.7 ng/mL and limits of quantification (LOQs) from 3.4 to 18.7 ng/mL for linoleic and stearic acid, respectively. Repeatability (%RSD, n = 5) was below 11.51% in all cases. In addition, the method linearity presented an r2 ≥0.990 for all ranges applied. Finally, the method was used to test the lipophilic fraction of various samples of commercial fruit juice.
AB - A method consisting of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) followed by injection-port derivatization and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) for the analysis of free lipophilic compounds in fruit juices is described. The method allows the analysis of several classes of lipophilic compounds, such as fatty acids, fatty alcohols, phytosterols and triterpenes. The chromatographic separation of the compounds was achieved in a chromatographic run of 25.5 min. The best conditions for the dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction were 100 μL of CHCl3 in 1 mL of acetone. For the injection-port derivatization, the best conditions were at 280 °C, 1 min purge-off, and a 1:1 sample:derivatization reagent ratio (v/v) using N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA):pyridine (1:1) as reagent. Quality parameters were assessed for the target compounds, giving a limits of detection (LODs) ranging from 1.1 to 5.7 ng/mL and limits of quantification (LOQs) from 3.4 to 18.7 ng/mL for linoleic and stearic acid, respectively. Repeatability (%RSD, n = 5) was below 11.51% in all cases. In addition, the method linearity presented an r2 ≥0.990 for all ranges applied. Finally, the method was used to test the lipophilic fraction of various samples of commercial fruit juice.
KW - DLLME
KW - Free lipophilic fraction
KW - Fruit juices
KW - GC–MS
KW - Injection-port derivatization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015896837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.03.027
DO - 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.03.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 28342584
AN - SCOPUS:85015896837
SN - 0021-9673
VL - 1495
SP - 12
EP - 21
JO - Journal of Chromatography A
JF - Journal of Chromatography A
ER -