TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing innovation competences in engineering students
T2 - a comparison of two approaches
AU - Charosky, Guido
AU - Hassi, Lotta
AU - Papageorgiou, Kyriaki
AU - Bragós, Ramon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The gap between industry needs and engineering graduates’ competences is being tackled by project-based courses, which also help to develop key innovation competences to address current societal challenges. Nevertheless, there is limited understanding about what innovation competences are developed through the different types of project-based courses. This study discusses innovation competences development in these courses with the aim of understanding how to better design educational strategies to improve them. Through content analysis, we compare the outcomes of two groups of Telecom Engineering students undergoing a capstone course following a classical product development project approach and a challenge-based course using Design Thinking. Results show that both course types contribute to developing innovation competences. Nevertheless, depending on the chosen pedagogy some competences are developed further. The traditional project-based course demonstrates better results in Planning and Managing Projects. Creativity, Leadership, and Entrepreneurship are more developed through a challenge-based approach combined with Design Thinking.
AB - The gap between industry needs and engineering graduates’ competences is being tackled by project-based courses, which also help to develop key innovation competences to address current societal challenges. Nevertheless, there is limited understanding about what innovation competences are developed through the different types of project-based courses. This study discusses innovation competences development in these courses with the aim of understanding how to better design educational strategies to improve them. Through content analysis, we compare the outcomes of two groups of Telecom Engineering students undergoing a capstone course following a classical product development project approach and a challenge-based course using Design Thinking. Results show that both course types contribute to developing innovation competences. Nevertheless, depending on the chosen pedagogy some competences are developed further. The traditional project-based course demonstrates better results in Planning and Managing Projects. Creativity, Leadership, and Entrepreneurship are more developed through a challenge-based approach combined with Design Thinking.
KW - challenge-based education
KW - Design Thinking
KW - innovation competences
KW - multidisciplinary education
KW - Project based learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115990981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03043797.2021.1968347
DO - 10.1080/03043797.2021.1968347
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85115990981
SN - 0304-3797
VL - 47
SP - 353
EP - 372
JO - European Journal of Engineering Education
JF - European Journal of Engineering Education
IS - 2
ER -