TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative study of the flexural properties of ABS, PLA and a PLA–wood composite manufactured through fused filament fabrication
AU - Travieso-Rodriguez, J. A.
AU - Jerez-Mesa, R.
AU - Llumà, Jordi
AU - Gomez-Gras, Giovanni
AU - Casadesus, Oriol
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2021/1/8
Y1 - 2021/1/8
N2 - Purpose: The aim of this paper is to analyze the mechanical properties of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) parts manufactured through fused filament fabrication and compare these results to analogous ones obtained on polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA–wood specimens to contribute for a wider understanding of the different materials used for additive manufacturing. Design/methodology/approach: With that aim, an experimental based on an L27 Taguchi array was used to combine the specific parameters taken into account in the study, namely, layer height, nozzle diameter, infill density, orientation and printing velocity. All samples were subjected to a four-point bending test performed according to the ASTM D6272 standard. Findings: Young’s modulus, elastic limit, maximum stress and maximum deformation of every sample were computed and subjected to an analysis of variance. Results prove that layer height and nozzle diameter are the most significant factors that affect the mechanical resistance in pieces generated through additive manufacturing and subjected to bending loads, regardless of the material. Practical implications: The best results were obtained by combining a layer height of 0.1 mm and a nozzle diameter of 0.6 mm. The comparison of materials evidenced that PLA and its composite version reinforced with wood particles present more rigidity than ABS, whereas the latter can experience further deflection before break. Originality/value: This study is of interest for manufacturers that want to decide which is the best material to be applied for their application, as it derives in a practical technical recommendation of the best parameters that should be selected to treat the material during the fused filament fabrication process.
AB - Purpose: The aim of this paper is to analyze the mechanical properties of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) parts manufactured through fused filament fabrication and compare these results to analogous ones obtained on polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA–wood specimens to contribute for a wider understanding of the different materials used for additive manufacturing. Design/methodology/approach: With that aim, an experimental based on an L27 Taguchi array was used to combine the specific parameters taken into account in the study, namely, layer height, nozzle diameter, infill density, orientation and printing velocity. All samples were subjected to a four-point bending test performed according to the ASTM D6272 standard. Findings: Young’s modulus, elastic limit, maximum stress and maximum deformation of every sample were computed and subjected to an analysis of variance. Results prove that layer height and nozzle diameter are the most significant factors that affect the mechanical resistance in pieces generated through additive manufacturing and subjected to bending loads, regardless of the material. Practical implications: The best results were obtained by combining a layer height of 0.1 mm and a nozzle diameter of 0.6 mm. The comparison of materials evidenced that PLA and its composite version reinforced with wood particles present more rigidity than ABS, whereas the latter can experience further deflection before break. Originality/value: This study is of interest for manufacturers that want to decide which is the best material to be applied for their application, as it derives in a practical technical recommendation of the best parameters that should be selected to treat the material during the fused filament fabrication process.
KW - ABS
KW - Composite materials
KW - Flexural properties
KW - Fused deposition modeling
KW - PLA
KW - Stress (materials)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094138732&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/RPJ-01-2020-0022
DO - 10.1108/RPJ-01-2020-0022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094138732
SN - 1355-2546
VL - 27
SP - 81
EP - 92
JO - Rapid Prototyping Journal
JF - Rapid Prototyping Journal
IS - 1
ER -