TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative effect of photodynamic therapy on separated or mixed cultures of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis
AU - Pérez-Laguna, Vanesa
AU - Pérez-Artiaga, Luna
AU - Lampaya-Pérez, Verónica
AU - López, Santiago Camacho
AU - García-Luque, Isabel
AU - Revillo, María José
AU - Nonell, Santi
AU - Gilaberte, Yolanda
AU - Rezusta, Antonio
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grant CTQ2013-48767-C3-2-R from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain and European Regional Development Fund.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has shown to exert a bactericidal effect against Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus mutans. However, this efficacy has been reported for either type of bacteria separately. Bacterial suspensions of both strains, separately or together, were treated with concentrations of methylene blue (MB) and rose bengal (RB). Suspensions were irradiated with a light–emitting diode lamp (λ center at 625 nm for MB and λ center at 515 nm for RB) using a fluence of 18 J/cm2. RB-aPDT at concentrations of 0.16–0.62 and 0.16–0.31 μg/mL, and MB-aPDT at concentrations of 0.62–1.25 and 0.31–1.25 μg/mL inhibited the growth of S. mutans and S. sanguinis respectively by 6 log10. In suspensions of both strains together, the same 6 log10 reduction in bacterial growth was achieved using the same concentrations of each photosensiziser. In conclusion, RB-aPDT and MB-aPDT appear to exert the same bactericidal effect against suspensions of S. sanguinis and S. mutans either for single strain treatment or for samples constituted by both bacteria mixed together. RB shows to be slightly more efficient than MB.
AB - Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has shown to exert a bactericidal effect against Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus mutans. However, this efficacy has been reported for either type of bacteria separately. Bacterial suspensions of both strains, separately or together, were treated with concentrations of methylene blue (MB) and rose bengal (RB). Suspensions were irradiated with a light–emitting diode lamp (λ center at 625 nm for MB and λ center at 515 nm for RB) using a fluence of 18 J/cm2. RB-aPDT at concentrations of 0.16–0.62 and 0.16–0.31 μg/mL, and MB-aPDT at concentrations of 0.62–1.25 and 0.31–1.25 μg/mL inhibited the growth of S. mutans and S. sanguinis respectively by 6 log10. In suspensions of both strains together, the same 6 log10 reduction in bacterial growth was achieved using the same concentrations of each photosensiziser. In conclusion, RB-aPDT and MB-aPDT appear to exert the same bactericidal effect against suspensions of S. sanguinis and S. mutans either for single strain treatment or for samples constituted by both bacteria mixed together. RB shows to be slightly more efficient than MB.
KW - Antimicrobial Photodynamic therapy
KW - Methylene Blue
KW - Rose Bengal
KW - Strep Mutans
KW - Strep Sanguinis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020250411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.05.017
DO - 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.05.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 28546111
AN - SCOPUS:85020250411
SN - 1572-1000
VL - 19
SP - 98
EP - 102
JO - Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
JF - Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
ER -