TY - JOUR
T1 - Combining biological processes with UV/H2O2 for metoprolol and metoprolol acid removal in hospital wastewater
AU - Jaén-Gil, Adrián
AU - Buttiglieri, Gianluigi
AU - Benito, Aleix
AU - Mir-Tutusaus, Josep Anton
AU - Gonzalez-Olmos, Rafael
AU - Caminal, Glòria
AU - Barceló, Damià
AU - Sarrà, Montserrat
AU - Rodriguez-Mozaz, Sara
N1 - Funding Information:
This work has been funded by the Spanish State Research Agency of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and European Fund for Regional Development (CTM 2013-48545-C2-1-R and CTM 2017-85385-C2-1-R). Authors thank Generalitat de Catalunya through Consolidated Research Group (2017-SGR-14, 2017-SGR-1404, ICRA-ENV 2017-SGR-1124, 2017-SGR-1318 and 2017-SGR-1016). ICRA researchers thank funding from CERCA program. S.R.M. and R.G.O. acknowledge the “Redes de Excelencia 2015” program (CTM 2015-71054-REDT). S.R.M. and G.B. acknowledge the Ramon y Cajal research fellowships (RYC-2014-16707 and RYC-2014-16754) from the Spanish State Research Agency of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (AEI-MCIU). A.J.G thanks the predoctoral grant from the Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR) (2019FI_B2_00202) co-financed by the European Social Fund. R.G.O. thanks to “Obra Social La Caixa” for receiving funding to carry out this research through the Intensification Research Fellowship 2017-URL-IR2Q-023. We would like to thank Sant Joan de Déu Hospital staff for their collaboration during the sampling campaign. We also thank to Thermo Scientific and Marie-Pierre Pavageau for the technical support using Compound Discoverer 3.0 software. This study was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (IDAEA Excelencia Severo Ochoa CEX2018-000794-S).
Funding Information:
This work has been funded by the Spanish State Research Agency of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and European Fund for Regional Development (CTM 2013-48545-C2-1-R and CTM 2017-85385-C2-1-R). Authors thank Generalitat de Catalunya through Consolidated Research Group ( 2017-SGR-14 , 2017-SGR-1404 , ICRA -ENV 2017-SGR-1124 , 2017-SGR-1318 and 2017-SGR-1016 ). ICRA researchers thank funding from CERCA program. S.R.M. and R.G.O. acknowledge the “Redes de Excelencia 2015” program ( CTM 2015-71054-REDT ). S.R.M. and G.B. acknowledge the Ramon y Cajal research fellowships ( RYC-2014-16707 and RYC-2014-16754 ) from the Spanish State Research Agency of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (AEI-MCIU). A.J.G thanks the predoctoral grant from the Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR) (2019FI_B2_00202) co-financed by the European Social Fund . R.G.O. thanks to “Obra Social La Caixa” for receiving funding to carry out this research through the Intensification Research Fellowship 2017-URL-IR2Q-023 . We would like to thank Sant Joan de Déu Hospital staff for their collaboration during the sampling campaign. We also thank to Thermo Scientific and Marie-Pierre Pavageau for the technical support using Compound Discoverer 3.0 software. This study was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (IDAEA Excelencia Severo Ochoa CEX2018-000794-S).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2021/1/15
Y1 - 2021/1/15
N2 - The transformation products (TPs) of water contaminants generated during wastewater treatment can sometimes be equally or even more hazardous than the parent compounds. Therefore, for a comprehensive assessment of removal efficiency of a water treatment technology, it is mandatory to monitor not only the pollutants but also of their TPs. However, this type of evaluation studies is lacking in the case of water combined treatments. In this study, the elimination of metoprolol (MTP), metoprolol acid (MTPA) and the TPs generated was evaluated in pure water and hospital wastewater (HWW) using UV/H2O2 before and after fungal (FG) or conventional activated sludge (CAS). The major transformation pathways were suggested in terms of transformation of the parent compounds through bio-transformation and photo-transformation mechanisms. The results reveal an extended removal of MTP, MTPA and TPs after UV/H2O2 single experiment treating spiked pure water at 2.5 mg/L, without increasing the treated effluents toxicity. However, combined treatments were required to achieve similar removal percentages in spiked real HWW at 2.0 µg/L: while AOPs combined with FG exhibited lower removal efficiencies with generation of persistent intermediates (such as α-HMTP and TP240), AOPs combined with CAS attained the higher persistent TPs removal. In particular, AOP + CAS was classified as the most effective combination for HWW with the highest removal of the parent compounds (86% for MTP and 100% for MTPA), of the intermediates generated (up to 85%) and with a low presence of toxic TPs (such as O-DMTP). This study demonstrates that comprehensive evaluation of the intermediates generated along water treatment technologies is highly recommended to successfully evaluate their removal efficiencies.
AB - The transformation products (TPs) of water contaminants generated during wastewater treatment can sometimes be equally or even more hazardous than the parent compounds. Therefore, for a comprehensive assessment of removal efficiency of a water treatment technology, it is mandatory to monitor not only the pollutants but also of their TPs. However, this type of evaluation studies is lacking in the case of water combined treatments. In this study, the elimination of metoprolol (MTP), metoprolol acid (MTPA) and the TPs generated was evaluated in pure water and hospital wastewater (HWW) using UV/H2O2 before and after fungal (FG) or conventional activated sludge (CAS). The major transformation pathways were suggested in terms of transformation of the parent compounds through bio-transformation and photo-transformation mechanisms. The results reveal an extended removal of MTP, MTPA and TPs after UV/H2O2 single experiment treating spiked pure water at 2.5 mg/L, without increasing the treated effluents toxicity. However, combined treatments were required to achieve similar removal percentages in spiked real HWW at 2.0 µg/L: while AOPs combined with FG exhibited lower removal efficiencies with generation of persistent intermediates (such as α-HMTP and TP240), AOPs combined with CAS attained the higher persistent TPs removal. In particular, AOP + CAS was classified as the most effective combination for HWW with the highest removal of the parent compounds (86% for MTP and 100% for MTPA), of the intermediates generated (up to 85%) and with a low presence of toxic TPs (such as O-DMTP). This study demonstrates that comprehensive evaluation of the intermediates generated along water treatment technologies is highly recommended to successfully evaluate their removal efficiencies.
KW - Combined treatments
KW - Metoprolol
KW - Metoprolol acid
KW - Suspect screening
KW - Transformation products
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088962856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/3622
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126482
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126482
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088962856
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 404
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 126482
ER -