TY - JOUR
T1 - Co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts
T2 - A Health CASCADE scoping review
AU - McCaffrey, Lauren
AU - McCann, Bryan
AU - Giné-Garriga, Maria
AU - An, Qingfan
AU - Cardon, Greet
AU - Chastin, Sebastien François Martin
AU - Chrifou, Rabab
AU - Lippke, Sonia
AU - Loisel, Quentin
AU - Longworth, Giuliana Raffaella
AU - Messiha, Katrina
AU - Vogelsang, Mira
AU - Whyte, Emily
AU - Dall, Philippa Margaret
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Objectives: This scoping review aimed to summarise available evidence relating to co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts. Understanding how participation in co-creation processes shapes experiences is important as it can offer insights into the improved development and effective use of such processes. Co-creation has increasingly gained attention due to its many claimed advantages and benefits to participants. There is however a lack of aggregated literature on stakeholders’ experience of the co-creation process. Study design: Scoping review. Methods: Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews was used. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus and the Health CASCADE Co-creation Database (an open access curated database of 13,501 articles, screened for inclusion based on criteria relating to co-creation participatory research). Themes were generated through thematic analysis. Results: We included 80 publications. Positive co-creation experiences were linked to establishing interpersonal relationships and positive group dynamics, enhanced well-being, personal development, satisfaction and fulfilment. Negative experiences were associated with initial uncertainties, project-related challenges, interpersonal issues, dissatisfaction, and disengagement. Conclusion: This review offers insights into how co-creation shaped experiences and demonstrates the scope and characteristics of co-creation experiences. It highlights the need for further research, particularly in understanding the mechanisms underpinning and explaining experiences and in strategies for promoting positive experiences and mitigating negative experiences.
AB - Objectives: This scoping review aimed to summarise available evidence relating to co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts. Understanding how participation in co-creation processes shapes experiences is important as it can offer insights into the improved development and effective use of such processes. Co-creation has increasingly gained attention due to its many claimed advantages and benefits to participants. There is however a lack of aggregated literature on stakeholders’ experience of the co-creation process. Study design: Scoping review. Methods: Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews was used. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus and the Health CASCADE Co-creation Database (an open access curated database of 13,501 articles, screened for inclusion based on criteria relating to co-creation participatory research). Themes were generated through thematic analysis. Results: We included 80 publications. Positive co-creation experiences were linked to establishing interpersonal relationships and positive group dynamics, enhanced well-being, personal development, satisfaction and fulfilment. Negative experiences were associated with initial uncertainties, project-related challenges, interpersonal issues, dissatisfaction, and disengagement. Conclusion: This review offers insights into how co-creation shaped experiences and demonstrates the scope and characteristics of co-creation experiences. It highlights the need for further research, particularly in understanding the mechanisms underpinning and explaining experiences and in strategies for promoting positive experiences and mitigating negative experiences.
KW - Co-creation
KW - Co-design
KW - Co-production
KW - Experience
KW - Scoping review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209710221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.002
M3 - Review
AN - SCOPUS:85209710221
SN - 0033-3506
VL - 238
SP - 29
EP - 36
JO - Public Health
JF - Public Health
ER -