TY - JOUR
T1 - Being a researcher is not only a matter of publishing
T2 - learning to review scientific articles / No solo de publicar viven los investigadores: aprender a revisar artículos científicos
AU - Castelló, Montserrat
AU - Sala-Bubaré, Anna
AU - Bautista, Alfredo
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was partially funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad under the ‘Formación del Investigador Novel en Ciencias Sociales’ (CSO2013-41108-R) project, and by the ‘Programa de Formación de Profesorado Universitario’ (FPU13/06957) of the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. / Esta investigación fue parcialmente
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Fundacion Infancia y Aprendizaje.
PY - 2017/7/3
Y1 - 2017/7/3
N2 - This study, which is part of the call for junior reviewers from Infancia & Aprendizaje (I&A), aims to contribute to the scarce literature on peer review processes by developing and analysing a training proposal designed to help junior researchers begin to take part in the peer review process. Five junior reviewers participated in the study. Their reports were analysed and compared with those of 10 experts, their individual trajectories were described, and their evaluation of the training proposal was explored. Results showed some particularities in the junior reviewers’ reports regarding their content and structure, such as the inconsistency between the decision taken and the type of comments. In addition, the junior reviewers’ adoption of a personal opinion position was not observed in the expert reviewers. Their individual trajectories showed the relevance of the training proposal, both to increase knowledge about the genre and to revise the reports. This study has implications for scientific journals as well as for the training of junior researchers.
AB - This study, which is part of the call for junior reviewers from Infancia & Aprendizaje (I&A), aims to contribute to the scarce literature on peer review processes by developing and analysing a training proposal designed to help junior researchers begin to take part in the peer review process. Five junior reviewers participated in the study. Their reports were analysed and compared with those of 10 experts, their individual trajectories were described, and their evaluation of the training proposal was explored. Results showed some particularities in the junior reviewers’ reports regarding their content and structure, such as the inconsistency between the decision taken and the type of comments. In addition, the junior reviewers’ adoption of a personal opinion position was not observed in the expert reviewers. Their individual trajectories showed the relevance of the training proposal, both to increase knowledge about the genre and to revise the reports. This study has implications for scientific journals as well as for the training of junior researchers.
KW - junior researcher training
KW - junior researchers
KW - peer review
KW - scientific publication
KW - writing of reports
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028886534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02103702.2017.1357251
DO - 10.1080/02103702.2017.1357251
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028886534
SN - 0210-3702
VL - 40
SP - 599
EP - 656
JO - Infancia y Aprendizaje
JF - Infancia y Aprendizaje
IS - 3
ER -