TY - JOUR
T1 - Automatic detection of noisy channels in fNIRS signal based on correlation analysis
AU - Guerrero-Mosquera, Carlos
AU - Borragán, Guillermo
AU - Peigneux, Philippe
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. The fNIRS equipment was supported by FNRS Grands Equipement Fund 2.5020.12. C. Guerrero-Mosquera is supported by FNRS project n T.0109.13. G. Borragán is supported by PAI-P7/33, BELSPO. P. Peigneux is ULB Francqui Research Professor 2013–2016.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016
PY - 2016/9/15
Y1 - 2016/9/15
N2 - Background fNIRS signals can be contaminated by distinct sources of noise. While most of the noise can be corrected using digital filters, optimized experimental paradigms or pre-processing methods, few approaches focus on the automatic detection of noisy channels. Methods In the present study, we propose a new method that detect automatically noisy fNIRS channels by combining the global correlations of the signal obtained from sliding windows (Cui et al., 2010) with correlation coefficients extracted experimental conditions defined by triggers. Results The validity of the method was evaluated on test data from 17 participants, for a total of 16 NIRS channels per subject, positioned over frontal, dorsolateral prefrontal, parietal and occipital areas. Additionally, the detection of noisy channels was tested in the context of different levels of cognitive requirement in a working memory N-back paradigm. Comparison with existing method(s) Bad channels detection accuracy, defined as the proportion of bad NIRS channels correctly detected among the total number of channels examined, was close to 91%. Under different cognitive conditions the area under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUC) increased from 60.5% (global correlations) to 91.2% (local correlations). Conclusions Our results show that global correlations are insufficient for detecting potentially noisy channels when the whole data signal is included in the analysis. In contrast, adding specific local information inherent to the experimental paradigm (e.g., cognitive conditions in a block or event-related design), improved detection performance for noisy channels. Also, we show that automated fNIRS channel detection can be achieved with high accuracy at low computational cost.
AB - Background fNIRS signals can be contaminated by distinct sources of noise. While most of the noise can be corrected using digital filters, optimized experimental paradigms or pre-processing methods, few approaches focus on the automatic detection of noisy channels. Methods In the present study, we propose a new method that detect automatically noisy fNIRS channels by combining the global correlations of the signal obtained from sliding windows (Cui et al., 2010) with correlation coefficients extracted experimental conditions defined by triggers. Results The validity of the method was evaluated on test data from 17 participants, for a total of 16 NIRS channels per subject, positioned over frontal, dorsolateral prefrontal, parietal and occipital areas. Additionally, the detection of noisy channels was tested in the context of different levels of cognitive requirement in a working memory N-back paradigm. Comparison with existing method(s) Bad channels detection accuracy, defined as the proportion of bad NIRS channels correctly detected among the total number of channels examined, was close to 91%. Under different cognitive conditions the area under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUC) increased from 60.5% (global correlations) to 91.2% (local correlations). Conclusions Our results show that global correlations are insufficient for detecting potentially noisy channels when the whole data signal is included in the analysis. In contrast, adding specific local information inherent to the experimental paradigm (e.g., cognitive conditions in a block or event-related design), improved detection performance for noisy channels. Also, we show that automated fNIRS channel detection can be achieved with high accuracy at low computational cost.
KW - Automatic detection
KW - Correlation analysis
KW - FNIRS
KW - Noisy channels
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979234390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.07.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.07.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 27452485
AN - SCOPUS:84979234390
SN - 0165-0270
VL - 271
SP - 128
EP - 138
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
ER -