TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the environmental impacts of three different types of accommodations in Portugal and Spain by using an LCA approach
AU - Campos, Cristina
AU - Dias, Ana Cláudia
AU - Quinteiro, Paula
AU - Gutiérrez, David
AU - Villanueva-Rey, Pedro
AU - Gallego, Maria
AU - Oliveira, Sara
AU - Laso, Jara
AU - Albertí, Jaume
AU - Bala, Alba
AU - Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
AU - Melón, Lela
AU - Fullana, Margalida
AU - Sazdovski, Ilija
AU - Roca, Mercè
AU - Xifré, Ramon
AU - Margallo, María
AU - Aldaco, Rubén
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - The tourism industry, affected by COVID-19, must reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This study evaluated the environmental impact of three hotels in coastal and mountainous regions of Spain and Portugal using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Data was gathered via surveys in the Greentour tool. Results indicate that the 2-star hotel (focused on cultural-urban tourism) has the highest impacts in most categories, except for CC, FRD, and POF indicators. The 3-star hotel (beach tourism) contributes the most to CC and FRD indicators, while the hostel (nature-religious tourism) has the highest value in the POF indicator. LCA findings reveal that diesel consumption in the hostel and electricity usage in both the 2-star and 3-star hotels are major contributors to environmental impacts across various categories. Overall, evidence suggests that fossil fuel and electricity usage significantly affect tourism activities environmentally. Interestingly, this study highlights that a 2-star hotel can have a higher carbon footprint (CC indicator) compared to a 3-star hotel, challenging the notion that higher star ratings imply lower environmental impact.
AB - The tourism industry, affected by COVID-19, must reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This study evaluated the environmental impact of three hotels in coastal and mountainous regions of Spain and Portugal using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Data was gathered via surveys in the Greentour tool. Results indicate that the 2-star hotel (focused on cultural-urban tourism) has the highest impacts in most categories, except for CC, FRD, and POF indicators. The 3-star hotel (beach tourism) contributes the most to CC and FRD indicators, while the hostel (nature-religious tourism) has the highest value in the POF indicator. LCA findings reveal that diesel consumption in the hostel and electricity usage in both the 2-star and 3-star hotels are major contributors to environmental impacts across various categories. Overall, evidence suggests that fossil fuel and electricity usage significantly affect tourism activities environmentally. Interestingly, this study highlights that a 2-star hotel can have a higher carbon footprint (CC indicator) compared to a 3-star hotel, challenging the notion that higher star ratings imply lower environmental impact.
KW - Accommodation
KW - Beach tourism
KW - Cultural tourism
KW - Environmental impacts
KW - Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
KW - Natural tourism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189756257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172230
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172230
M3 - Article
C2 - 38582111
AN - SCOPUS:85189756257
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 927
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
M1 - 172230
ER -