TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of nutrient profile models to compare products offered in ‘healthy’ vs ‘conventional’ vending machines in a Spanish hospital environment
AU - Carrillo-Álvarez, E.
AU - Caro-García, E.
AU - Cayssials, V.
AU - Jakszyn, P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Royal Society for Public Health
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - Introduction: Vending machines promote easy access to food with low nutritional value. ‘Healthy’ vending machines (HVM) have been introduced as a means to improve the availability and accessibility of healthy food options, and the healthiness of the foods, however, has not been evaluated. Objective: Our aim was to assess the healthiness of the products offered in HVM and ‘conventional’ vending machines (CVM), located in the Catalan Institute of Oncology. Study design and methods: All products available in vending machines (HVM (n = 33) and CVM (n = 62) were evaluate during three nutrient profile models (NPMs): the World Health Organization's European Regional Office model (WHO), Nutrient Profile Model UK (NPM-UK), and Australian Health Star Rating system (HSR). Results: Regardless of the NPM used, significant differences found in the proportion of healthy products among HVM and CVM (WHO: P-value = 0.005, NPM-UK: P value < 0.001, HSR: P-value < 0.001). The healthy products offered in HVM accounted for 30%, 73%, and 52% of the total content, while CVM offered 6%, 32%, and 15% of the content, as assessed by WHO, NPM-UK, and HSR, respectively. The WHO model was the most restrictive model, and the NPM-UK was the most permissible one. Conclusions: Although not all products in HVM are rated as healthy by the different NPMs, the percentage of healthy products was significantly higher than those in CVM.
AB - Introduction: Vending machines promote easy access to food with low nutritional value. ‘Healthy’ vending machines (HVM) have been introduced as a means to improve the availability and accessibility of healthy food options, and the healthiness of the foods, however, has not been evaluated. Objective: Our aim was to assess the healthiness of the products offered in HVM and ‘conventional’ vending machines (CVM), located in the Catalan Institute of Oncology. Study design and methods: All products available in vending machines (HVM (n = 33) and CVM (n = 62) were evaluate during three nutrient profile models (NPMs): the World Health Organization's European Regional Office model (WHO), Nutrient Profile Model UK (NPM-UK), and Australian Health Star Rating system (HSR). Results: Regardless of the NPM used, significant differences found in the proportion of healthy products among HVM and CVM (WHO: P-value = 0.005, NPM-UK: P value < 0.001, HSR: P-value < 0.001). The healthy products offered in HVM accounted for 30%, 73%, and 52% of the total content, while CVM offered 6%, 32%, and 15% of the content, as assessed by WHO, NPM-UK, and HSR, respectively. The WHO model was the most restrictive model, and the NPM-UK was the most permissible one. Conclusions: Although not all products in HVM are rated as healthy by the different NPMs, the percentage of healthy products was significantly higher than those in CVM.
KW - Dietary guidelines
KW - Hospital environment
KW - Nutrient profile models
KW - Public health
KW - Vending machines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075826546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000515532700019?SID=EUW1ED0D143UigAIQw3Jf0csx85Gz
U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.10.007
DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.10.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 31812091
AN - SCOPUS:85075826546
SN - 0033-3506
VL - 179
SP - 135
EP - 146
JO - Public Health
JF - Public Health
ER -