TY - JOUR
T1 - Additionality and Implementation Gaps in Voluntary Sustainability Standards
AU - Dietz, Thomas
AU - Grabs, J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Ministry for Culture and Science of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia. Junior Research Groups [grant number 005-1503-0008].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Voluntary Sustainability Standards have become a popular private governance framework for more sustainable agri-food value chains. However, recent mainstreaming efforts have increased competition between standards and driven down price premiums. This study employs a dataset of 659 Honduran coffee producers to examine whether the most widely used standards in the coffee sector (4C, Fairtrade, Fairtrade/organic, UTZ Certified and Rainforest Alliance) represent effective solutions for improving the social, environmental and economic sustainability practices of smallholder farmers under such conditions. It presents 54 farm-level indicators, compared across five standard systems, and links field results to a discussion of the strategies and governance prospects of voluntary standards. We find that no scheme has managed to grow substantially while maintaining strong additionality: commercially successful standards show little impact, while stricter schemes create high entry barriers and unresolved opportunity costs. Successful mainstreaming would require better cost coverage of sustainability improvements by value chain actors.
AB - Voluntary Sustainability Standards have become a popular private governance framework for more sustainable agri-food value chains. However, recent mainstreaming efforts have increased competition between standards and driven down price premiums. This study employs a dataset of 659 Honduran coffee producers to examine whether the most widely used standards in the coffee sector (4C, Fairtrade, Fairtrade/organic, UTZ Certified and Rainforest Alliance) represent effective solutions for improving the social, environmental and economic sustainability practices of smallholder farmers under such conditions. It presents 54 farm-level indicators, compared across five standard systems, and links field results to a discussion of the strategies and governance prospects of voluntary standards. We find that no scheme has managed to grow substantially while maintaining strong additionality: commercially successful standards show little impact, while stricter schemes create high entry barriers and unresolved opportunity costs. Successful mainstreaming would require better cost coverage of sustainability improvements by value chain actors.
KW - Honduras
KW - Voluntary sustainability standards
KW - coffee
KW - global value chains
KW - impact evaluation
KW - sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100831369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13563467.2021.1881473
DO - 10.1080/13563467.2021.1881473
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100831369
SN - 1356-3467
VL - 27
SP - 203
EP - 224
JO - New Political Economy
JF - New Political Economy
IS - 2
ER -