TY - JOUR
T1 - A Poset-Generalizability Method for Human Development Indicators
AU - Comim, Flavio
N1 - Funding Information:
I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Reiner Bruggemann for his generous and helpful comments as well as the valuable suggestions put forward by two anonymous referees.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - The paper introduces a poset-generalizability perspective for analysing human development indicators. It suggests a new method for identifying admissibility of different informational spaces and criteria in human development analysis. From its inception, the Capability Approach has argued for informational pluralism in normative evaluations. But in practice, it has turned its back to other (non-capability) informational spaces for being imperfect, biased or incomplete and providing a mere evidential role in normative evaluations. This paper offers the construction of a proper method to overcome this shortcoming. It combines tools from poset analysis and generalizability theory to put forward a systematic categorization of cases with different informational spaces. It provides illustrations by using key informational spaces, namely, resources, rights, subjective well-being and capabilities. The offered method is simpler and more concrete than mere human development guidelines and at the same time it avoids results based on automatic calculations. The paper concludes with implications for human development policies and an agenda for further work.
AB - The paper introduces a poset-generalizability perspective for analysing human development indicators. It suggests a new method for identifying admissibility of different informational spaces and criteria in human development analysis. From its inception, the Capability Approach has argued for informational pluralism in normative evaluations. But in practice, it has turned its back to other (non-capability) informational spaces for being imperfect, biased or incomplete and providing a mere evidential role in normative evaluations. This paper offers the construction of a proper method to overcome this shortcoming. It combines tools from poset analysis and generalizability theory to put forward a systematic categorization of cases with different informational spaces. It provides illustrations by using key informational spaces, namely, resources, rights, subjective well-being and capabilities. The offered method is simpler and more concrete than mere human development guidelines and at the same time it avoids results based on automatic calculations. The paper concludes with implications for human development policies and an agenda for further work.
KW - Capability approach
KW - Generalizability theory
KW - Human development indicators
KW - Informational pluralism
KW - Poset analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108090332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/3717
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/3717
U2 - 10.1007/s11205-021-02737-0
DO - 10.1007/s11205-021-02737-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85108090332
SN - 0303-8300
VL - 158
SP - 1179
EP - 1198
JO - Social Indicators Research
JF - Social Indicators Research
IS - 3
ER -