TY - JOUR
T1 - A critical review of superfoods from a holistic nutritional and environmental approach
AU - Fernández-Ríos, Ana
AU - Laso, Jara
AU - Hoehn, Daniel
AU - Amo-Setién, Francisco José
AU - Abajas-Bustillo, Rebeca
AU - Ortego, Carmen
AU - Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
AU - Bala, Alba
AU - Batlle-Bayer, Laura
AU - Balcells, Merce
AU - Puig, Rita
AU - Aldaco, Rubén
AU - Margallo, María
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the KAIROS-BIOCIR project ( PID2019-104925RB ) (AEO/FEDER, UE). Ana Fernández-Ríos thanks the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spanish Government for their financial support via the research fellowship RE2020-094029 .
Funding Information:
The reality of these products is not as attractive as publicity suggests; the benefits are not scientifically proven. Healthy claims are frequently not strongly supported by scientific evidence, especially not by controlled human intervention trials (van den Driessche et al., 2018), which makes the list of superfoods grow uncontrolled year by year (Proestos, 2018). In addition, the lack of an established criteria for categorizing foods as ‘super’ and the indiscriminate marketing that have taken place has led some authors to consider them as ‘food fraud’ (Curll et al., 2016). These claims evidence the call for stricter regulations and a food fraud policy to regulate false health claims of superfoods (Smith, 2019). Since 2007, according to the European Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims of foods (European Commission, 2006), the term ‘superfood’, which is considered a claim, cannot be advertised on product packaging or advertising, as only healthy properties supported by a solid scientific basis and evaluated by EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) are authorized. Furthermore, the European Regulation (EC) No. 1169/2011, relative to the food information that must be provided to the consumers (European European Union, 2011), establishes that the presentation of a product must not mislead the consumer as to the characteristics of the food or attribute to it properties to cure or treat diseases (AESAN, 2019). The lack of consensus among the information that consumers can find in different sources can lead to an indirect risk to public health thereby detrimentally impacting their capacity to make informed and accurate choices (Curll et al., 2016). Therefore, superfoods must be defined and have their own legislation in terms of requirements or labelling, such as ‘eco’ or ‘bio’ products, which are governed by the Regulation (EU) 2018/484, on ecological production (European Union, 2018), which states that a product can only be advertised as organic or bio when at least 95% of the ingredients come from ecological production.A total of 42 studies developing the LCA of superfoods were selected from the bibliographic search. As Fig. 5 illustrates, only the environmental performance of 15 of the 40 superfoods under study was analyzed, evidencing the important lack of information surrounding this scientific field and justifying the need of this revision to provide an overview on the state of the question and guidelines for further analyses. However, the increase number of publications is noticeable, reflecting the growing concern for environmental issues among the scientific community, but also the importance and acceptance of LCA as a useful methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of a wide range of products. This latter evidence was recently reinforced by the EPLCA (European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment), which bet on adopting a life cycle thinking to assess the sustainability of EU food systems, supply chains, and to account for food waste, in support to the EU farm-to-fork strategy (European Commission, 2022).This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the KAIROS-BIOCIR project (PID2019-104925RB) (AEO/FEDER, UE). Ana Fernández-Ríos thanks the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spanish Government for their financial support via the research fellowship RE2020-094029.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/12/15
Y1 - 2022/12/15
N2 - In a global arena in which the identification of healthier and cleaner nutrient sources is practically mandatory, superfoods, known as foods of high nutritional and biological value with satisfactory bioavailability and bioactivity within the body due to extraordinary concentrations of nutrients and bioactive ingredients, can play a key role. These products are highly connected with sustainability, which is composed of an economic, environmental, and social balance, mainly translated in meeting nutritional needs. Focusing on the two latter aspects, this article is intended to provide a breakthrough in the knowledge by assessing the nutritional characteristics and environmental performance of superfoods. Firstly, a selection is made by revising the nutritional profile of different products. Secondly, a review of life cycle assessment (LCA) studies aims to establish guidelines for future analyses, based on the current state-of-art and possible recommendations, as well as to provide information on the impacts of these novel products. 40 superfoods are identified, of which only 15 have environmental analysis. The LCA revision enable to recognize methodological vulnerabilities based on the lack of definition of the function, allocations, uncertainty and quality assessments, as well as a weak justification on the selection of data sources and impact categories. Other recommendations include the possibility of using nutrient-based functional unit, extending system boundaries up to retailer, applying high quality primary data and standardized databases, and analyzing a wider range of indicators. Finally, this scientific field is still little explored, so the suitability of superfoods from an environmental perspective cannot be concluded, thus encouraging the use of LCA to fill this scientific gap.
AB - In a global arena in which the identification of healthier and cleaner nutrient sources is practically mandatory, superfoods, known as foods of high nutritional and biological value with satisfactory bioavailability and bioactivity within the body due to extraordinary concentrations of nutrients and bioactive ingredients, can play a key role. These products are highly connected with sustainability, which is composed of an economic, environmental, and social balance, mainly translated in meeting nutritional needs. Focusing on the two latter aspects, this article is intended to provide a breakthrough in the knowledge by assessing the nutritional characteristics and environmental performance of superfoods. Firstly, a selection is made by revising the nutritional profile of different products. Secondly, a review of life cycle assessment (LCA) studies aims to establish guidelines for future analyses, based on the current state-of-art and possible recommendations, as well as to provide information on the impacts of these novel products. 40 superfoods are identified, of which only 15 have environmental analysis. The LCA revision enable to recognize methodological vulnerabilities based on the lack of definition of the function, allocations, uncertainty and quality assessments, as well as a weak justification on the selection of data sources and impact categories. Other recommendations include the possibility of using nutrient-based functional unit, extending system boundaries up to retailer, applying high quality primary data and standardized databases, and analyzing a wider range of indicators. Finally, this scientific field is still little explored, so the suitability of superfoods from an environmental perspective cannot be concluded, thus encouraging the use of LCA to fill this scientific gap.
KW - Environmental impacts
KW - Future food
KW - Health benefits
KW - LCA methodology
KW - Life cycle assessment (LCA)
KW - Nutritional properties
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140143497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134491
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134491
M3 - Review
AN - SCOPUS:85140143497
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 379
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 134491
ER -