TY - JOUR
T1 - A competence-based view of industry evolution
T2 - The impact of submarket convergence on incumbent2entrant dynamics
AU - Uzunca, Bilgehan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Academy of Management Journal.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Understanding intra-industry boundaries is important because it offers insight into firms' strategic options based on their competences. Defining intra-industry heterogeneity in terms of the technological and customer competences that are required to produce and sell different products in each submarket, this paper explores whether the convergence of these competences, i.e., an increase in the degree to which competences can be leveraged across submarkets, exerts differential effects on the success of industry incumbents versus entrants. Empirical evidence from the global semiconductor manufacturing industry shows that convergence in both technological and customer competences decreases entrants' survival chances, whereas a lack of convergence in any one of the two types of competence-that is, in one set of competences or another but not in both-gives entrants sufficient room to gain a foothold in the industry and to potentially disrupt incumbents. As a strategic response to disruption, multiplant industry incumbents can reposition themselves by changing their focus across submarkets while not necessarily exiting the industry entirely. The paper contributes to the literature on industry evolution, disruption, and competitive dynamics and has implications for future research and practice.
AB - Understanding intra-industry boundaries is important because it offers insight into firms' strategic options based on their competences. Defining intra-industry heterogeneity in terms of the technological and customer competences that are required to produce and sell different products in each submarket, this paper explores whether the convergence of these competences, i.e., an increase in the degree to which competences can be leveraged across submarkets, exerts differential effects on the success of industry incumbents versus entrants. Empirical evidence from the global semiconductor manufacturing industry shows that convergence in both technological and customer competences decreases entrants' survival chances, whereas a lack of convergence in any one of the two types of competence-that is, in one set of competences or another but not in both-gives entrants sufficient room to gain a foothold in the industry and to potentially disrupt incumbents. As a strategic response to disruption, multiplant industry incumbents can reposition themselves by changing their focus across submarkets while not necessarily exiting the industry entirely. The paper contributes to the literature on industry evolution, disruption, and competitive dynamics and has implications for future research and practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046128301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5465/amj.2015.1080
DO - 10.5465/amj.2015.1080
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046128301
SN - 0001-4273
VL - 61
SP - 738
EP - 768
JO - Academy of Management Journal
JF - Academy of Management Journal
IS - 2
ER -